An inconvenient truth about science
How many of you know who won the Nobel Peace Prize this year? Probably a significant number would be able to name former US vice president Al Gore, chosen for his work on climate change.
Similarly, a lot of people would be able to name this year’s Nobel winner for literature British author Doris Lessing.
Now for the tricky question. Who won the Nobel prize for physics, and why?
I doubt many of you know the answer. Certainly if you rely on most national news sources, it is unlikely that you will have heard about the success of Frenchman Albert Fert and German Peter Grunberg.
The two scientists were responsible for discovering giant magnetoresistance (GMR), an effect in which a small alteration in magnetic charge can produce a major change in electrical resistance.
According to the citation for the award: “A system of this kind is the perfect tool for reading data from hard disks when information registered magnetically has to be converted to electric current. In 1997 the first read-out head based on the GMR effect was launched and this soon became the standard technology. Even the most recent read-out techniques of today are further developments of GMR.”
You would not be listening to an iPod without the work of Fert and Grunberg. Their discovery led directly to the development of the small, high-capacity disk drives that are central to the consumerisation of technology and the radical changes sweeping the music industry, as well as to improving data storage for businesses.
I would guess you have never heard of them, yet how many more people have benefited from Fert and Grunberg’s work than have read a book by Doris Lessing?
How many more people around the world use hard disk-based MP3 players, compared with the number who have seen Gore’s film, An Inconvenient Truth?
The low public awareness of science and technology is a topic that this column has referred to many times before, and will no doubt do so again. The two scientists who have made such a huge contribution to everyday life all over the world received scant coverage or public recognition. What they did was extremely technical but what it enabled is extremely simple to understand.
You will get tired of hearing this message before long, but it will come back to haunt us: in China and India, they can’t get enough of science and technology; in the UK, we can’t be doing with it. You do the maths - or rather, do the science.



Recent Comments